Court Rejects Legal Challenge to Tinubu’s Presidency
In a landmark decision on December 16, 2024, Nigeria’s Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit seeking the removal of President Bola Tinubu from office over drug and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) allegations. The suit, filed by Ambrose Owuru, a 2019 presidential candidate from the Hope Democratic Party (HDP), alleged that Tinubu was unfit to hold office due to his past drug-related conviction and supposed CIA connections. The Court, however, dismissed the case as “frivolous,” marking a significant legal victory for Tinubu.
Drug and CIA Allegations at the Heart of the Suit
Owuru’s lawsuit claimed that Tinubu’s involvement in a drug case, in which he forfeited $460,000 to the U.S. government, made him unsuitable for office. He further argued that Tinubu’s alleged links to the CIA made him beholden to foreign powers, violating Nigerian constitutional provisions that protect the sovereignty of the nation. Owuru sought to have the Supreme Court invoke Section 157 of the 1999 Constitution to disqualify Tinubu from holding the presidency.
Supreme Court Imposes Fine and Issues Warning
In response to the frivolous nature of the claims, the five-member panel of justices, led by Justice Uwani Abba-Aji, unanimously ruled against the lawsuit. The Supreme Court imposed a fine of N5 million on Owuru and issued a stern warning to the Registry not to accept any similar frivolous suits in the future. The Court emphasized that legal action should be based on merit, not political motivations.
Owuru’s Past Legal Battles and Electoral Claims
This case is not the first time Owuru has pursued legal action against Nigeria’s presidential elections. He had previously attempted to prevent the swearing-in of both former President Muhammadu Buhari and President Tinubu, citing election manipulation by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Owuru also claimed he had won a referendum before the 2019 election, alleging that he had garnered over 50 million votes—far surpassing the votes of the actual candidates. His claims, however, lacked substantiated evidence.
Previous Legal Setbacks and Consistent Dismissals
Owuru’s legal pursuits have been consistently dismissed by Nigerian courts. In May 2023, the Court of Appeal imposed a N40 million fine on him for filing a “frivolous” case that sought to stop Tinubu’s inauguration. Despite these setbacks, Owuru remains adamant about his legal battles and continues to claim that he was denied his rightful mandate in both the 2019 and 2023 elections.
Strengthening Tinubu’s Position and the Rule of Law
Following the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the lawsuit, Tinubu’s legal team expressed their satisfaction with the ruling, stressing the importance of maintaining a legal system that addresses legitimate concerns rather than political attacks. The decision reaffirms the Court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and preventing the judiciary from being used as a tool for political maneuvering. With the case now behind him, President Tinubu is free to focus on his presidential agenda, while critics are reminded that legal challenges must be grounded in evidence, not baseless allegations.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s verdict solidifies Tinubu’s position and serves as a reminder that unsubstantiated claims cannot undermine the integrity of the nation’s leadership. It also highlights the need for credible legal processes that ensure fair governance and accountability.
Follow us on Socials:
Facebook
Twitter